The 2027 State of Interview Intelligence Report
New research from Textio and Kyle & Co finds employers are confident their interview process is working—while candidates report unprepared interviewers, unacceptable feedback, and fraud detection gone wrong.
Textio’s 2025 research analyzed 10,000+ interview assessments across nearly 4,000 candidates. We found the likable candidate gets the job, even if they’re not the most qualified.
Spoiler: one thinks they’re doing great, the other thinks… things are not great.
Talent leaders scored their own company’s interview process at +48.25 on a standard recommendation scale. Job seekers, rating a process they had actually been through, scored it +2.87.
Employers report all is well. Candidates report mixed experiences. Something isn’t working as designed.
of employers say their interviews are usually or always structured
of job seekers say their most recent process felt at least partly improvised, and 7% say the interviewer seemed to be winging it
When asked for the single thing that matters most when judging a hiring process as good, candidates said:
Candidates want more consistency and communication in hiring. They’re getting thoughtless feedback or straight up ghosted instead.
of employers say rejected finalists usually or always receive substantive, personalized feedback
of job seekers rejected at a final round got a templated line, no explanation, or no reply at all
Webinar
You have all the data. Now join us on Thursday, November 12 at 11 a.m. PT / 2 p.m. ET to hear from talent leaders on what comes next. Register below!
Register!
Matt CharneyTA Analyst at Kyle & Co
Colleen GallagherCEO at Textio
How confident talent leaders are that their interviewers can tell when a candidate is using AI assistance during a live interview
of job seekers have felt an employer wrongly suspected them of cheating or misrepresenting themselves
Employers are right to be on guard: 83% of job seekers say candidate misrepresentation is at least fairly common. It’s not that fraud is overblown. It’s that employers aren’t as good at detecting it as they think they are.
admit to exaggerating a skill or credential
say they’ve had someone help them answer in a live interview
report they’ve used AI covertly in an interview
of candidates who had a poor interview experience say they would never apply to the company again
say they would never apply again and they would stop buying from the company
Employer brand = Company brand = Company revenue.
The full report includes:
Textio is a leader in building AI tools that help high-growth companies recruit high-performing teams.
The company’s latest innovation, Lavalier, is an interview intelligence platform that helps recruiting teams get the right evidence from interviews to make better hiring decisions with.
Founded in 2014, people leaders at companies like Bloomberg, Cisco, Johnson & Johnson, Samsung, Spotify, and more choose Textio to help them attract and develop top talent. Textio has been named to TIME’s 2026 Top WorkTech Companies, Fast Company’s World’s Most Innovative Companies list several times, in addition to the Fortune Impact 20, Forbes AI 50, and CNBC Disruptor 50.
